Skip to content
JAVIS JAVIS Community
Login
Collapse

Case Study: Driving FMCG Sales with JioStar During IPL 2025

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Market Wins
case studyfmcgeditors pick
1 Posts 1 Posters 8 Views 1 Watching
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • RohilR
    Rohil wrote last edited by
    #1

    Executive Summary

    FMCG brands that advertised on JioStar during TATA IPL 2025 delivered a +5.7% average sales uplift across 4,400+ stores, 40+ brands, and 15 categories (Aintu Inc. study). Performance improved with cross-screen mixes (TV + digital), higher investment tiers, and richer formats (video + display). The findings position JioStar’s IPL inventory as a scalable sales-activation lever, not just a reach vehicle.

    Business Objective

    Convert seasonal IPL reach into measurable store-level sales for FMCG portfolios while identifying the optimal media mix (screen, spend tier, and format) to guide future playbooks.

    Context & Challenge

    • IPL spikes attention but fragmentation (TV vs. digital, urban vs. rural, modern trade vs. GT) makes it hard to tie ads to scans.

    • Marketers need proof of incrementality beyond vanity metrics and a mix model that scales across categories.

    Intervention

    Brands ran IPL-timed campaigns on JioStar with varied mixes:

    • Screens: TV only vs. Digital only vs. Cross-screen

    • Formats: Video only vs. Video + display

    • Spend tiers: ₹10 cr+ vs. sub-₹10 cr

    Measurement Design (Abridged)

    • Sample: 4,400+ stores; 40+ brands; 15 FMCG categories

    • Windows: Pre-IPL baseline → IPL flight → short tail

    • Method: Matched-store comparisons and pre/post analysis controlling for seasonality; category and region fixed effects to reduce noise

    • Primary KPI: Value sales uplift (%) versus matched control

    Note: As with all field studies, residual confounders (pricing, trade push, distribution changes) are possible; see Limitations.

    Results

    Headline Impact

    • +5.7% average value uplift across participating brands.

    Mix That Outperformed

    • Cross-screen (TV + Digital): +6.3% vs Single screen: +5.3%
    • Higher investment (₹10 cr+): +8.4% vs <₹10 cr: +4.9%
    • Video + Display: +7.2% vs Video-only: +5.5%

    Category Notes (directional)

    • Impulse and beverages saw faster week-1 response; home & personal care built steadier, cumulative gains over the flight.

    • Stores with digital-led audiences (higher app usage) showed stronger video+display responsiveness.

    What Drove the Gains (Interpretation)

    1. Cross-screen coherence: TV builds mass salience while digital tightens recency and frequency near the point of purchase.

    2. Creative surface area: Adding display to video increases product reminders during consideration and replenishment cycles.

    3. Scale economics: Above the ₹10 cr threshold, brands reach sufficient weekly GRPs/Imps to sustain an always-on presence through the IPL calendar.

    Commercial Implications (Back-of-Envelope ROI)

    • If a brand’s IPL-period baseline sales are ₹100 cr, a +5.7% uplift ≈ ₹5.7 cr incremental.

    • With ₹8 cr media: ROI = 0.71x gross.

    • With ₹10 cr+ (avg. +8.4% uplift): incremental ≈ ₹8.4 cr; ROI = 0.84x gross.

    • After trade margins and gross margin (e.g., 40–55%), several portfolios clear positive contribution when creative and retail activation are coordinated (bundles, shelf, coupons).

    Recommendation: model contribution ROI using brand-specific margins and pass-through; the media mix is close to break-even on gross and typically positive on contribution with in-store support.

    Playbook for IPL 2026

    Mix & Investment

    • Anchor on cross-screen; resist TV-only or digital-only unless budget-constrained.

    • Target ₹10–12 cr per core brand (or pooled by category) to hit effective weekly frequency.

    • Use video + display; deploy display to sustain mid-flight reminders and last-mile nudges.

    Audience & Timing

    • Front-load awareness in opening fortnight, then maintain steady weekly pressure; spike again in playoffs/finals.

    • Layer retail media (Blinkit, Zepto, Amazon/Flipkart) to capture in-moment demand; synchronize price/promos.

    Creative & Merchandising

    • Build two creative lines: (1) Mass salience (TV) and (2) Offer/variant reminders (digital/display).

    • Mirror claims and packs on PDPs and store shelves; ensure consistent SKU/hero image and inventory in hot ZIPs.

    Measurement

    • Set up geo-split or matched-store tests with MMM/MTA overlays.

    • Track incrementality by screen, format, spend tier, and retailer cohorts.

    • Define safety KPIs: out-of-stock rate, price parity, and cost-to-serve during spikes.

    Risks & Limitations

    • Attribution bleed from concurrent promotions or competitor moves.

    • Distribution gaps can cap uplift even with strong media.

    • Creative wear-out if weekly rotation is thin; plan 3–4 cutdowns and display variants.

    Next Steps

    1. Pre-book cross-screen inventory and lock video + display bundles.

    2. Run a 2-cell experiment (cross-screen vs. single-screen) in matched regions.

    3. Integrate retail media and JioStar reporting into one incrementality dashboard.

    4. Align trade plans (fill rates, secondary visibility) to the media calendar to avoid stock-out drag.

    One-Slide Summary (for leadership)

    • Impact: +5.7% avg uplift (peaks: +8.4% at ₹10 cr+, +7.2% with video+display).

    • Winner Mix: Cross-screen > single screen; video+display > video-only.

    • So What: Treat JioStar IPL as a sales activation channel; pair with retail media & shelf to convert reach to revenue.

    • Do Next: Lock cross-screen, spend at scale, add display, run controlled tests, and tie to in-store execution.

    Visit MediaNews4U

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    • First post
      Last post
    0