What makes this strategically important is the direction of trade. For years, India’s electronics growth was led by final assembly, while a large share of components, materials, and sub-assemblies still came from China. ET says domestic value addition remained around 15%–20%, which meant India scaled output without capturing much of the deeper manufacturing value. The new export flow suggests India is starting to build capability in higher-value layers such as printed circuit board assemblies, mechanical parts, and specialized modules.

The policy architecture behind this matters. The article says India’s earlier PLI scheme helped create scale in finished goods, especially mobile phones, while the newer Electronics Components Manufacturing Scheme (ECMS) was launched to close the component gap by incentivizing domestic production of components, materials, and manufacturing equipment. ET positions ECMS as the missing middle layer between assembly scale and upstream semiconductor ambitions.

The bigger supply-chain signal is this: the real strategic upgrade is not more assembly lines, but more control over the inputs that determine cost, lead times, resilience, and bargaining power. ET notes ECMS-backed investments could help raise domestic value addition to 35%–40% over the next five years. If that happens, India’s role in global electronics shifts from being a large assembly base to becoming a more integrated manufacturing node.

Why it matters:
In electronics, the strongest supply-chain position does not come from assembling more products. It comes from owning more of the component layer that decides where value, resilience, and strategic autonomy actually sit. This final framing is an inference from ET’s data and policy analysis.

Visit EconomicTimes